<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Monster&#8217;s Trademark Claims Against Vermonster Stink</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beernationshow.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beernationshow.com/?p=469</link>
	<description>Exploring the Craft Beer Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:56:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monster Energy Drink&#8217;s Monstery Conduct &#8211; Just In Time For Halloween &#171; Accident Attorney Advice.com</title>
		<link>http://beernationshow.com/?p=469&#038;cpage=1#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Monster Energy Drink&#8217;s Monstery Conduct &#8211; Just In Time For Halloween &#171; Accident Attorney Advice.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobohd.com/shows/BeerNation/?p=469#comment-109</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Monster&#8217;s Trademark Claims Against Vermonster Stink Hansen&#8217;s argument, however, is weak for several reasons. First, why would anyone believe that a product named &#8220;VERmonster&#8221; &#8212; a mark alluding to the state of Vermont &#8212; is affiliated with Monster energy drinks? Second, the term &#8220;monster&#8221; isn&#8217;t exactly distinct to Hansen&#8217;s energy drink. In fact, we correlate the term &#8220;monster&#8221; with so many things (e.g., job-searching websites, creatures in Loch Ness, etc.). Third, while some energy drinks have moved into the alcoholic beverage market, none of them have yet entered the beer market. For these reasons, it&#8217;s doubtful that Hansen has a viable argument that Rock Art&#8217;s &#8220;Vermonster&#8221; causes a &#8220;likelihood of confusion.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Monster&#8217;s Trademark Claims Against Vermonster Stink Hansen&#8217;s argument, however, is weak for several reasons. First, why would anyone believe that a product named &#8220;VERmonster&#8221; &#8212; a mark alluding to the state of Vermont &#8212; is affiliated with Monster energy drinks? Second, the term &#8220;monster&#8221; isn&#8217;t exactly distinct to Hansen&#8217;s energy drink. In fact, we correlate the term &#8220;monster&#8221; with so many things (e.g., job-searching websites, creatures in Loch Ness, etc.). Third, while some energy drinks have moved into the alcoholic beverage market, none of them have yet entered the beer market. For these reasons, it&#8217;s doubtful that Hansen has a viable argument that Rock Art&#8217;s &#8220;Vermonster&#8221; causes a &#8220;likelihood of confusion.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOYCOTT MONSTER ENERGY &#171; SUPPORT ROCK ART BREWERY SAVE VERMONSTER</title>
		<link>http://beernationshow.com/?p=469&#038;cpage=1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>BOYCOTT MONSTER ENERGY &#171; SUPPORT ROCK ART BREWERY SAVE VERMONSTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobohd.com/shows/BeerNation/?p=469#comment-108</guid>
		<description>[...] BEER NATION &#8212; &#8220;Why Monster’s Trademark Claims Against Vermonster Stink&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BEER NATION &#8212; &#8220;Why Monster’s Trademark Claims Against Vermonster Stink&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetz</title>
		<link>http://beernationshow.com/?p=469&#038;cpage=1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobohd.com/shows/BeerNation/?p=469#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t be the first time that naysayers forced a beer to change its label:

http://beertalking.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/lagunitas-censored-kronik.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t be the first time that naysayers forced a beer to change its label:</p>
<p><a href="http://beertalking.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/lagunitas-censored-kronik.png" rel="nofollow">http://beertalking.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/lagunitas-censored-kronik.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
